![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
A Fragment of the Starchild’s FOXP2 Gene is Recovered:
A New Partial Analysis Of DNA Reinforces That Absolute Proof Can Be Obtained To Confirm The Starchild Skull Is Not Human. © Lloyd Pye, 2012 For 13 years we at the Starchild Project have known the Starchild Skull came from a being that was not entirely human, if human at all. First, it shares no physical characteristics with a normal human skull—none! Unfortunately, this astounding divergence in physical points of comparison never impressed mainstream scientists because they could, and often did, glibly explain all of them away by insisting: Nature can do anything! But that was never true.
http://www.starchildproject.com/dna2012.htmNature actually functions by strict rules that confine life to well-defined boundaries outlined by the unique genetic code of each species. No laws are more firmly established than the laws of genetics. Fifty eye-witnesses can say that a person committed a crime, but if DNA shows otherwise, the witnesses are ignored. DNA dominates in courts because it is the math of biology. It says what it says, again and again, with consistency you can stake your life on. Within that life-and-death consistency, the human genome does contain slight variations. Tiny Pygmies and tall Watusis are black Africans with stark physical differences, yet both tribes are unmistakably human. Differences in their genetic makeup make it impossible for two Pygmies to produce a Watusi, and vice-versa. Yet DNA can flex enough so that if one of each tribe were to mate, they could produce viable offspring, although the flexibility does not go beyond certain points. Something is either human, or it isn’t. There is no in-between. Because genetics is the math of biology, the Starchild’s DNA provided the only means to overcome the mainstream explanation that it has to be a one-in-a-billion freak of Nature. Unfortunately, we had to wait nearly a decade while the technology for recovering and sequencing “ancient” DNA, such as the 900-year-old Starchild’s, could be perfected. Now such new technology has been in place for a few years, and its initial extraordinarily high cost has fallen within the reach of reasonable investment. Also, we now have enough partial analyses of the Starchild’s DNA to know without doubt that when we can afford a complete inventory of its genome, it will prove to be radically different from humans..... Check out the rest of this artical... I just listened to Coast to Coasts interview with Llyod Pye and I think our technology is bringing us to the verge of changing the way we believe in this world! xo Froggie ![]()
__________________
You are an artist, you are unique, you are expressing your self. Last edited by frogborg : 03-07-2012 at 06:43 PM. |
|||||
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Interesting article....thanks Froggie. There was a watered down television version of this information a few weeks ago. Seems this little fellow's head continues to confound scientists hope for exactly perfect confirmation! lol
Love, Wolfdog |
||||
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:26 AM.
view cart







Linear Mode
